最新なF5 301b問題集（210題）、真実試験の問題を全部にカバー！

質問 1：
-- Exhibit- -- Exhibit -

Refer to the exhibit.
A failover has just occured on BIG-IP1. BIG-IP2 is now active and manages traffic as expected. Both Bigip's are set with a gateway failsafe to check the reachability of the main border router. Switches have performed as expected.
Where should the LTM Specialist check for potential issues?
A. Network Interface 2.2 of BIG-IP 2
B. Network Interface 2.1 of BIG-IP 2
C. Network Interface 1.1 of BIG-IP 1
D. Network Interface 2.1 of BIG-IP 1
E. Network Interface 2.2 of BIG-IP 1
F. Network Interface 1.1 of BIG-IP 2
正解：D

質問 2：
-- Exhibit-


-- Exhibit -
Refer to the exhibits.
An LTM device has been configured for load balancing a number of different application servers. Configuration changes need to be made to the LTM device to allow administrative management of the servers in 172.16.10/24, 172.16.20/24, and 172.16.30/24 networks. The servers require outbound access to numerous destinations for operations.
Which solution has the simplest configuration changes while maintaining functionality and basic security?
A. Replace 172.16.10.0:0/24, 172.16.20.0:0/24, and 172.16.30.0:0/24, with 172.16.0.0:0/16, and keep 0.0.0.0:0/0.0.0.0.
B. Enable 172.16.10.0:0/24, 172.16.20.0:0/24, and 172.16.30.0:0/24 on egress VLAN(s), and enable 0.0.0.0:0/0.0.0.0 on ingress VLAN(s).
C. Enable 172.16.10.0:0/24, 172.16.20.0:0/24, and 172.16.30.0:0/24 on ingress VLAN(s), and enable 0.0.0.0:0/0.0.0.0 on egress VLAN(s).
D. Remove 172.16.10.0:0/24, 172.16.20.0:0/24, and 172.16.30.0:0/24, and keep 0.0.0.0:0/0.0.0.0 enabled on all VLANs.
正解：C

質問 3：
Given the iRule:
when HTTP_REQUEST {
if {([HTTP::username] ne "") and ([HTTP::password] ne "") } {
log local0. "client ip [IP::remote_addr] credentials provided [HTTP::username] [HTTP::password]"}
else {
pool old_application_pool
}
}
The associated virtual server has a default pool named new_application_pool.
Which functionality does the iRule provide?
A. Allows clients with credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the access of clients without credentials to the new_application_pool.
B. Allows clients without credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the access of clients with credentials to the new_application_pool.
C. Allows clients with credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the attempted access of clients with credentials to the new_application_pool.
D. Allows clients without credentials to access the old_application_pool and logs the attempted access of clients without credentials to the new_application_pool.
正解：B

質問 4：
What does the following iRule do?
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {
if { [matchclass [IP::client_addr] equals WebClient1-Whitelist1] }{
#log local0. "Valid client IP: [IP::client_addr] - forwarding traffic"
#Pool WebClient1
} else {
log local0. "Invalid client IP: [IP::client_addr] - discarding"
discard
}
}
A. The iRule compares a client IP to a list. If the client IP is on the list, the client is sent to Pool WebClient1. Otherwise, discard and log the discard.
B. The iRule compares a client IP to a list. If the client IP is NOT on the list, discard and log the discard.
C. The iRule compares a client IP to a list. If the client IP is on the list, discard and log the discard.
D. The iRule compares a client IP to a list. If the client IP is NOT on the list, the client is sent to Pool WebClient1. Otherwise, discard and log the discard.
正解：B

質問 5：
The LTM Specialist is writing a custom HTTP monitor for a web application and has viewed the content by accessing the site directly via their browser. The monitor continually fails. The monitor configuration is:
ltm monitor http /Common/exampleComMonitor {
defaults-from /Common/http
destination *:*
interval 5
recv "Recent Searches"
send "GET /app/feed/current\?uid=20145 HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost:
www.example.com\\r\\nAccept-EncodinG.gzip, deflate\\r\\nConnection: close\\r\\n\\r\\n"
time-until-up 0
timeout 16
}
A trace shows the following request and response:
Request:
GET /app/feed/current?uid=20145 HTTP/1.1
Host www.example.com
Accept-Encoding gzip, deflate
Connection: close
Response: HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily Date Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:45:52 GMT Server Apache Location https://example.com/login.jsp Content-Encoding gzip Content-Type text/html;charset=UTF-8 Set-CookiE.JSESSIONID=261EFFBDA8EC3036FBCC22D991AC6835;
Path=/app/feed/current?uid=20145
What is the problem?
A. The HTTP monitor does NOT support monitoring jsp pages.
B. The request does NOT include any cookies and the application is expecting a session cookie.
C. The request includes an Accept-Encoding so the server is responding with a gzipped result and LTM monitors CANNOT handle gzipped responses.
D. The request does NOT include a User-Agent header.
正解：B